deviant ART

[x]

lunar moon shot through scope by *pynipple:iconpynipple:


©2008 *pynipple
Details
Submitted: February 4
File Size: 1.2 MB
Image Size: 251 KB
Resolution: 1280×983
Comments: 32
Favourites & Collections: 30 [who?]

Views
Total: 1,004
Today: 0

Downloads
Total: 16
Today: 0

Embed


Thumb


Picture
Make: Canon
Model: Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II
Shutter Speed: 1/4 second
F Number: F/2.8
Focal Length: 14 mm
ISO Speed: 50
Date Picture Taken: Jan 22, 2008, 2:40:55 AM

Artist's Comments

I finally attached my Canon 1DsMk2 to my Meade LX200GPS 10" Schmitt-Cassegrain telescope and got some great close lunar shots

This was just a rough go at it and pretty much just a test of the onboard tracking system in my telescope mount

Believe it or not, it's not easy to watch the moon at this magnification because it moves so fast, so the telescope has a tracking system that allows it to move super gently and keep whatever I program into it to stay in the frame

Now that I got this set up, I'm planning on adding quite a few more to this gallery

Sorry about the general darkness of this one but as I mentioned, this was my first go with the actual telescope ... I prefer just using a long lens, my DSLR and a nice steady tripod, but I had reached the limits of resolution as you can see in my other moon shots so I had to do something else

Next up will be planetary photography, some deep space stuff if I can find come nice colorful nebulae or something like that ...hopefully some satellite and space station photography and of course my favorite, more lunar photography

Hope you like it ... as with all of my work, this is free for you to use in your dA work as you want to, but please put a link to your work in here so I can see what you've made of it … any work outside of dA is also OK but I would like a link to that as well so I can check it out

There are NO restrictions on using this in your print work either ... if you can manipulate this and sell it as a print, good for you ... as far as I go, I do this just for the fun of it and making money from my photography would somehow belittle it and make it less 'special' for me

I DID include this in my print account, just like all of my other work, but I only do this so people have a good and high quality option available if they want one of my photos printed ... DeviantArt prints are very high quality (especially the canvas prints ... amazing!) - whatever "profit" I make from any prints that I sell will either go directly towards my dA subscription, or I will be happy to donate my take of the prints to YOUR dA subscription if you want (the profit from my prints is really small, usually less than $2.00 even on the large ones, so you’re paying for the actual print, not for me taking the photo)

I have my prints set at the very lowest cost that the system will allow me to, so if you do want any of my photos printed, it's not that bad of a deal

And as always, if you want a full sized copy of one of my photos (usually 4992x3328 from my Canon 1DsMarkII) I will be happy to email you one or send it through a messaging system if you want to print a full sized copy yourself … some of them, like this one, are cropped a little to get the subject closer

Have fun with it, I sure am ... more to come soon … hit the DOWNLOAD button for the really big version with NO WATERMARK!

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 1 1 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0

~Chrissyo:iconChrissyo: Feb 4, 2008, 3:40:41 AM
Sweet shot! Looking forward to some more! :)

--
-Chrissyo [link]
*pynipple:iconpynipple: Feb 4, 2008, 5:19:34 AM
thanks, I'm also looking forward to it ... I'm trying really hard to figure out a way to get a permanent base for a scope at my house ... maybe a storage shed with a retractable roof or something

I'm moving away from the Twin Cities about 2 hours south where there are nice and clear skies all the time … once I'm set up out there with all my gear being set up all the time I should be able to really get some work out

My biggest problem is taking out and setting up my scope, computer and all of my camera gear … it just takes so long and is so much effort that I don’t get out and do it too often, but if I can get a permanent observatory set up a home for cheap then I’ll be out there almost every night

Thanks again for the fav’s … and your ----GALLERY---- RULES

--
A poor photographer can make any lens look bad, but the best lens cannot improve a poor photographer.
~Chrissyo:iconChrissyo: Feb 4, 2008, 11:07:40 PM
Moving away from light pollution will be good! There's nothing quite like some clear skies.

I agree with you about setting up - it's so annoying! Especially when the clouds start to drift over when you've just finished setting up. =P I love the dobsonian mount so much because of this, you can just take it out, plop it down and get observing. Quick and easy.

Thanks for the kind words about my gallery! :)

--
-Chrissyo [link]
~SarahRoxUrSox:iconSarahRoxUrSox: Feb 12, 2008, 7:10:07 AM
Awesome shot! I'm jealous :P
I bet you've heard of the eclipse next week (feb 20th)

--
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you the less you know." --Diane Arbus
=scott67:iconscott67: Feb 12, 2008, 5:38:32 PM
Great shot!

I have a love/hate relationship with my 1Ds MkII. How in the world do you keep the sensor clean? Mine continuously collects dust and is driving me up the wall. I'm ready to trade it in. :( My old 20D was never anywhere near this bad.
*Singingnaturist:iconSingingnaturist: Feb 17, 2008, 1:38:50 AM
Great photo. - Phil

--
Inspire others IF you are able
*pynipple:iconpynipple: Feb 17, 2008, 2:56:59 AM
Thank you very much Phil ... I've been a long time fan and watcher of your GALLERY - great stuff in there

thanks again for the comment and the :+fav: ... :pringles::slyfart:

--
A poor photographer can make any lens look bad, but the best lens cannot improve a poor photographer.
*Singingnaturist:iconSingingnaturist: Feb 17, 2008, 12:28:16 PM
Thanks very much indeed and for your kind comments on my gallery, I am really pleased you enjoy it. Keep up the good work!! - Phil :)

--
Inspire others IF you are able
*froggynaan:iconfroggynaan: Feb 21, 2008, 6:16:46 PM
Awesome shot. I always wanted to try this but I never had the patience to find the right eyepiece and focus it correctly. The quality of these shots is pretty good. There's not much chromatic abberation. Was it a particularly good telescope?

--
Macro photography is where it's at! ~macrophoto
*pynipple:iconpynipple: Feb 21, 2008, 10:16:12 PM
thanks ... it's a Meade LX200GPS with the upgraded UHTC coatings - I wouldn't call it a professional scope, it was around $5500 US for the scope/accessories + another $1600 for the eyepieces all brand new – of course I could have saved money and purchased used gear but I didn’t see any for sale at the time I got mine

one kind of unnecessary expense for me was the eyepieces, I really splurged and got the nicest eyepiece set I would buy, which will last me a life time regardless of any upgraded scopes I may end up with in the future, so this was more of an investment than a purchase … the scope itself I consider a purchase because I will be selling it to buy a new one in a few years or less and I will undoubtedly lost money on the scope

as far as CA, I haven't noticed a problem with this scope at all, but maybe I've just been lucky so far ... what I can say is that I would recommend one of these scopes for just about anyone ... I've seen them for sale (complete for less than $2400) ... if you can afford it, it's an incredible way to get into the hobby and this scope is still small enough for 2 people to tear down and assemble if you want to take it to a star party - from what I've seen, this is about the largest Schmitt-Cassegrain a person would want to consider as a "portable" unit

as far as build quality, it’s just amazingly well made and super easy to use and the image quality kind of speaks for itself … and remember, this was my first time out with the scope/camera combo and I was just messing around – I would guess that someone with some real astrophotographic skill could make a lot of money from the print revenue after a good photo shoot or two with one of these

I kind of wish I would have gotten the 16" version, but I don't currently have a permanent mount for it ... I'm hoping to have a permanent stationary observatory in the back of my house sometime in the next 4-5 years and then I will have either the 16" or maybe even a 20" ... probably the 20" unless I get impatient ... but in order to go that far with my equipment I need to make this more than a casual hobby to justify the expense

from my experience, these images probably OK for the scope, but not the best that this equipment can produce - I know a lot about photography, but I'm still learning astrophotography so there's still a lot of tricks for me to learn - luckily I have some good equipment to work with so that part isn't holding me back

anyways, thanks for the comment – I’ll post more as I take them :pringles::slyfart:

--
A poor photographer can make any lens look bad, but the best lens cannot improve a poor photographer.